|
Integrating the finest, latest research evidence available with
clinical expertise and patient values. There is a hierarchy of
evidence. Some types of evidence are better than others. There
are four steps in the EBM process:
1. Formulating the question
2. Information search
3. Review of information and critical appraisal
4. Using the results in clinical practice—integrating the
evidence with patient factors
5. Evaluation of the whole process for improvement
In formulating the clinical questions, the “PICO” approach
is often used: defining the patient, intervention, comparator and
outcome.
http://www.thecochranelibrary.com
http://www.pubmed.gov (choose clinical query)
http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/
http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd
http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb
http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/
http://health-evidence.ca
http://www.ncchta.org
http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com
http://www.tripdatabase.com
http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu
http://www.guidelines.gov
http://www.nice.org.uk
http://cks.nhs.uk
http://www.cma.ca/cpgs
http://www.bestbets.org
http://www.cebm.net
http://www.eboncall.org
http://www.sicsebm.org.uk
http://www.otcats.com
http://www.pubmed.gov
http://www.cancer.gov
http://evidence.ahc.umn.edu/ebn.htm
http://library.nyu.edu/health/evidence/
http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca
http://www.mclibrary.duke.edu/subject/ebm/
http://www.ebm.med.ualberta.ca/
http://www.health.usyd.edu.au/current/coursework/ebm.php
http://library.ncahec.net/ebm/pages/index.htm
http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/hiru/
http://www.ahrq.gov/browse/evidmed.htm
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/ir/links/index
http://www.inahta.org
http://www.consort-statement.org
http://www.agreecollaboration.org
http://spph.ubc.ca/sites/healthcare/files/calc/clinsig.html
If you have comments or suggestions, email me at amangino@barnabashealth.org
[ Library Home ] [ top ] |